Home › Chapter Guide › Chapter 7
The C-Level Guide to Linking: Google’s War on Link-Building
The tactics most often pitched to you can help, or hurt, your visibility. What works, what’s risky, and what is likely to earn you a penalty.
The spectrum of link-building from white hat to black hat, with the grey in between. What makes a link worth having, which practices put the site at risk, and how to say no, justify, or filter the conversations you’ll have with your team, agency or partners.
Goals
- Explain the different types of link-building tactics.
- Set out the risk and reward of each.
- Let you oversee link-building decisions with confidence.
You’ll walk away able to
- Understand the kinds of links and what they do.
- Identify and steer clear of high-risk tactics.
- Justify your link decisions to other stakeholders.
When a link-building tactic is pitched, three questions do most of the filtering. Where do the links come from? Is the content around them relevant and any good? And is the short-term gain worth the long-term risk to the brand?
Sustainable link-building protects reputation and compounds. Quick fixes do neither.
Link tactics by risk
Low risk. Slow. Compounds.
Fully within Google’s guidelines: content and expertise that earn links from reputable sites.
- Looks like: original research, expert contributions to industry publications, useful tools, webinars.
- For: sustainable, and builds real authority.
- Against: resource-intensive and takes longer.
Medium risk. Faster. Fragile.
Not explicitly forbidden, but questionable when overused.
- Looks like: heavy link exchanges, private blog networks, aggressive press-release syndication.
- For: can move rankings sooner.
- Against: one algorithm update away from a problem.
High risk. Quick. Can remove you from results.
Designed to manipulate rankings, in breach of the guidelines.
- Looks like: buying links, comment and forum spam, hidden links.
- For: a possible short-term boost.
- Against: penalties up to de-indexing. If a proposal includes it, the answer is no.
The new frontier, with the same rules.
AI systems weigh what independent sources say about you.
- Earned: genuine reviews, press, analyst and community discussion. Worth investing in.
- Manufactured: paid “best of” list placements, seeded forum posts, fake reviews. The paid links of this decade.
- Leader’s test: would we be comfortable if a customer saw exactly how this mention came about?
AI answers have widened the definition of authority. Assistants build their view of a brand from what the wider web says about it: reviews, press, forums, industry sites. A mention without a link now counts for something.
Which means the old game has a new version. Buying or faking mentions is the paid link of the AI era, and Google’s 2026 AI search guidance names “inauthentic mentions” among the tactics to avoid. The war on link-building is becoming a war on mention farming.
This is the Authority pillar: proof that makes your claims credible, and experiences that lead customers to recommend you. Links are one form of proof. Outcomes, research, reviews and independent corroboration are others, and they are harder to fake.
- A short history of links in Google’s algorithm
- How to evaluate a link proposal in five minutes
- Justifying decisions: sustainability, reputation and ROI
- What a Google penalty actually costs
- Questions to ask any link-building vendor
In the book.
Join the list and get it first.